On May 30, Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian presided over the example meeting of the Komiks 1960 witch cloth draw.
A reporter asked, in his recent speech on China policy toward China, US Secretary of State Blinken said that China poses the most serious and long-term challenge to the international order, and the United States must defend and reform the “rules-based international order”. What is the spokesperson’s comment on this?
Photo source: Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Zhao Lijian said that Blinken’s speech on China is full of lies and inverted black and white, among which the attack on China’s Babaylan 1990 clothes draw is based on what the United States does today. The United States itself wears the most serious and long-term challenge to the international order. The so-called “rules-based international order” advocated by the United States is to put it bluntly, it is an international order based on American rules, and it is a hegemonic order that dominates the world with “family laws and regulations”. Last week, my colleagues responded to what he said in Cinema 1950 witch cloth draw. Today I am willing to list some facts and numbers to help everyone further see the US lies and fallacies and its hypocrisy.
First of all, the United States has no fear of the international order based on the UN Charter and international law. The United States has been in power for more than 200 years and has not fought for only 16 years. It has become the biggest source of chaos in the current international peace and stability and the biggest instability factor in international order. The United States claims to defend self-determination, sovereignty and peaceful settlement established by the UN CharterCinema 1950 witch cloth draw concepts, but they are actually saying one thing and doing another. As American writer William Bloom pointed out in his book “Democracy America’s Fatal Export”, since the end of World War II, the United States has tried to overthrow more than 50 foreign governments and roughly interfere in democratic elections in at least 30 countries. According to a report by the United States’ Boston University in 2001, the United States has been 1990 clothes since 2001. drawIn the name of “counter-terrorism”, either launches wars or conducts military operations, causing more than 800,000 deaths, including 300,000 civilians, and more than 20 million refugees were generated by victimized countries such as Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria alone.
Secondly, the United States is the biggest destroyer of the international order. It has become common for the United States to adhere to American-centrism and American exceptionalism, and break contracts and withdraw from groups at will. This has become commonplace. The United States not only refuses to sign or ratify the United Nations “Komiks 1960 witch cloth draw” and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, href=”https://comicmov.com/”>Komiks 1960 witch cloth draw voted against the Global Compact on Migration and the Global Compact on Refugees, and exclusively blocked negotiations on the UN Convention on the Prohibition of Biological WeaponsBabaylan 1990 cloth drawCinema 1950 witch cloth since the 20th centuryCinema 1950 witch cloth drawSince the 1980s, the United States has withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council, WHO, UNESCO, Paris Agreement, Iran nuclear agreement, and the Arms Trade Treaty.w, the Intermediate-Range Forces Treaty, the Open Skies Treaty and other 17 international organizations or agreements, including “retreat and return, return and return”. Such an American is so arrogant that he disguised himself as a referee of international rules, using the so-called rules to shine on others, and ignoring the darkness under his own light. When US politicians are confidently speaking with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, they don’t know if they know that the United States is not even a party to the Convention.
Third, the United States is not qualified to discuss the rules. In the United States’ view, international rules have always been subordinate to and serve American interests and hegemony. When the two are consistent, the United States uses rules as a basis, which is contrary to the rules. I would like to ask the US side to answer a few questions: When the United States wants to launch a war against sovereign states, what are the rules? When the United States imposes illegal unilateral sanctions and traps the people of relevant countries in a large number of ways to deal with water and fire, what are the rules? When the United States continues to arrears of US$1 billion in membership dues and US$1.4 billion in peacekeeping assessments, what are the rules? When the United States engages in trilateral security partnerships and quadratic mechanisms, in an attempt to build an Indo-Pacific version of NATO, disrupting the Asia-Pacific and undermining the international nuclear non-proliferation system, what are the rules? When the United States, under the banner of so-called democracy, under the so-called “democracy summit” that divides the camp, excludes most of the world’s countries from outside, what are the rules? When the WTO clearly confirms that the US tariff war against China violates global trade rules, but the US does not enforce it or even obstructs the WTO Appellate Body to appoint a new judge, what is the rule?
Finally, the United States is the culmination of coercive diplomacy. USAPut domestic law above international law and international rules, and abuse illegal unilateral sanctions and long-arm jurisdiction. Since the outbreak of the new crown pneumonia epidemic, Venezuela, Syria and Iran have been subject to long-term sanctions by the United States, and the domestic economic and medical conditions are harsh, and the epidemic situation is severe. The United States has not stopped sanctions, but has further increased its efforts, making these countries worse. The international community is increasingly seeing the principles of market competition and international economic and trade advocated by the United States, and will only be abide by the United States when it is favorable to the United States. American politicians talk about fair competition and free trade. They believe in the United States first and the American stick waving in their hands.
Zhao Lijian stressed that in the more than 70 years since the founding of New China, we have not taken the initiative to launch a war or occupied an inch of land from other countries. We insist on resolving disputes through dialogue and negotiation, and have completely resolved the land border issue in a peaceful manner with 12 of the 14 land neighbors. As the world’s second largest economy, China’s contribution to global economic growth has remained at around 30% for many years, ranking first in the world for 15 consecutive years. China has become the second largest fund for UN membership and peacekeeping funds, actively participate in the construction and reform of the global governance system, and maintain the spirit of the UN Charter and the authority of the UN with practical actions. Facts have proved and will continue to prove that China has always been a builder of world peace, a contributor to global development, and a defender of international order. China will always work with all peace-loving and justice-loving countries to unite under the banner of the United Nations, practice true multilateralism, and continue to contribute confidence, wisdom and strength to the universal prosperity of the world and the common progress of mankind.