Virus tracing should be based on science
‘ /> /* Optimize header flickering problem */header{ pKomiksosition: fixeKomiksd; top: 0; Babaylan width: 100%; z-index: 100000;}.article{padding-top: 1.2rem;}.detail_page nav{ padding-tCinemaop: 1.5Komiksrem; position: relative;} News Center>China>ChinaCinemaFocus WHO: All the evidence has been known to show that the origin of the new coronavirus is an animal of the animal. KomiksSource: CCTV News Client Author: Posted BabaylanTime: 2020-04-23 11:28 Share Cinema to Cinema KomiksA spokesperson for the World Health Organization said on the 21st that the WHO is currently carrying out two major struggles against the new crown pneumonia epidemic and the “false information pandemic”. Judging from the known evidence of Cinema, the new coronavirus originated from an animal, rather than being pre-made or manufactured by artificial laboratories in the laboratory.
World Health Organization spokesman Fadra Fadra said at a regular press conference on the 21st that there are some fallacies and conspiracy theories about the origin of the new coronavirus on the media and social media. All known evidence suggests that the coronavirus is derived from an animal.
WHO issued a Cinema Spokesperson Fatira Shayib: The WHO is fighting the COVID-19 pandemic, while Babaylan is also fighting the disinformation pandemic. All known evidence suggests that the coronavirus comes from animals, not artificially intervened or manufactured in the laboratory. The new coronavirus is most likely from bats, but it is not clear how it is transmitted to humans by Cinema, which must have been intermediary hosts. The WHO welcomes scientific researchers from all over the world to find the source of the new coronavirus. The WHO is participating in the investigations carried out by many experts on this basis.
Many medical experts are also consistent with the views of the WHO. A team from the Scripps Institute in the United States published an article saying that there is no evidence that the new coronavirus was made in a laboratory or designed in other human ways. If viruses are to be created through laboratories, they must rely on the backbone of known viruses for development, but research has found that the trunk structure of the new coronavirus and any known virus in humans is different.
Olivier, head of the Virus and Immunization Department of the Pasteur Institute in France, Komiks·Schwartz also recently said that the new coronavirus is not produced in the laboratory. By drawing the genetic lineage of the virus, we know that it is derived from the virus transmitted from nature. Very similar viruses were found in different animals, especially in the pangolins and bats.
Edward Holmes, a virology expert at the University of Sydney, Australia: The new coronavirus cannot be manufactured in a laboratory or leaked from Babaylan. Because all the constituent structures in this virus can be found in animal species in nature, and if someone wants to artificially create coronavirus, Komiks, generally speaking, they will choose a standard laboratory virus strain, but the new coronavirus is not a standard laboratory strain. I am sure the whole world will think it is a natural coronavirus, produced in a natural evolutionary way from Cinema animals, without any lab-operation characteristics at all.