On May 30, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian presided over a regular press conference.
A reporter asked, in his recent speech on China policy toward China, US Secretary of State Blinken said that China poses the most serious and long-term challenge to the international order. The United States must defend and reform the “rules-based international order”. What is the spokesperson’s comment on this?
Photo source: Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Zhao LiCinemajian said that Blinken’s speech on China is full of lies and inverted black and white, and the basis for attacking China is exactly what the United States does today. The United States itself is most suitable for the hat that poses the most serious and long-term challenge to the international order. The so-called “rules-based international order” advocated by the United States is to put it bluntly, the international order based on American rules is the hegemonic order that uses “family laws and regulations” to dominate the world. My colleagues have responded to the content of his speech last week. Today I am willing to list some facts and numbers to help everyone further see the US lies and fallacies and its hypocrisy.
First of all, the United States has no fear of the international order based on the Charter of the United Nations and international law. The United States has been in power for more than 200 years and has not fought for only 16 years. It has become the biggest source of chaos in the current international peace and stability and the biggest instability factor in the international order. The United States claims to defend the concepts of self-determination, sovereignty and peaceful settlement of disputes established by the UN Charter, but they are actually saying one thing and doing another. As American writer William Bloom pointed out in his book “Democracy: America’s Fatal Export”, since the end of World War II, the United States has tried to overthrow more than 50 foreign governments and roughly interfered in the democratic elections in at least 30 countries. According to a report from Brown University in the United States, since only 2001, the United States has been in the name of “counter-terrorism”, orThe war or military operations have caused more than 800,000 deaths, including 300,000 civilians, and more than 20 million Cinema refugees were generated by victimized countries such as Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria.
SecondlyBabaylan, the United States is the biggest destroyer of the international order. The United States adheres to American centricism and the United States’ exceptionalism and breaks contracts and withdraws from the group at will. This has become a common family. The United States not only refuses to sign or ratify the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, but also votes against the Global Compact on Migration and the Global Compact on Refugees, but also exclusively blocks negotiations on the UN Protocol to the Verification of the Convention on Biological Weapons. Since the 1980s, the United States has withdrew from 17 international organizations or agreements including the United Nations Human Rights Council, the WHO, UNESCO, the Paris Agreement, the Iran nuclear agreement, the Arms Trade Treaty, the Sino-Rail Treaty, the Open Skies Treaty, and other 17 international organizations or agreements, including the United Nations Human Rights Council, the World Health Organization, the United Nations Educational and Cultural Organization Agreement, and there is also a situation of “retreat and return, return and retreat”. Such an American is so arrogant that he disguised himself as a referee of international rules, using the so-called rules to shine on others, and ignoring the darkness under his own light. When US politicians were politicians politicized with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, they didn’t know whether they knew that the United States was not even a party to the Convention.
Thirdly, the United States is not qualified to discuss rules at all. In the United States’ view, international rules have always been subordinate to and serve American interests and hegemony. When the two are consistent, the United States uses rules as a basis, and when they are contrary to each other, it regards rules as air. I would like to ask the US side to answer several questions: When the United States launches wars against sovereign countries and launches a color revolution, what are the rules? When the United States imposes bad newsWhen the law imposes unilateral sanctions on people of relevant countries, what are the rules? When the United States continues to arrears of US$1 billion in membership dues and US$1.4 billion in peacekeeping assessments, what are the rules? When the United States engages in trilateral security partnerships and quadratic mechanisms, and attempts to build an Indo-Pacific version of NATO, which will disrupt the Asia-Pacific region and undermine the international nuclear non-proliferation system, what are the rules? When the United States, under the so-called “Democracy Summit” of the so-called democratic flag, excludes more than half of the world’s countries, what are the rules? When the WTO’s tariff war against Babaylan clearly confirmed that the United States violates global trade rules by violating global trade rules, but the United States does not enforce it or even obstructs the WTO Appellate Body’s appointment of a new judge?
Finally, the United States is the culmination of coercive diplomacy. The United States places domestic law above international law and international rules, and abuses illegal unilateral sanctions and long-arm jurisdiction. Since the outbreak of the new crown pneumonia epidemic, Venezuela, Syria, and Iran have been subject to long-term sanctions by the United States, and their domestic economic and medical conditions are bad, and the epidemic situation is severe. The United States has not stopped sanctions, but has further increased its efforts, making these countries worse. The international community is increasingly seeing the principles of market competition and international economic and trade advocated by the United States, and will only be abide by the United States when it is favorable to the United States. American politicians talk about fair competition and free trade, and believe in the United States first and the American stick is waved in their hands. Zhao Lijian stressed that in the more than 70 years since the founding of New China, we have not taken the initiative to launch a war, nor have we encroached on an inch of land in other countries. We insist on resolving disputes through dialogue and negotiation, and have completely resolved the land border issue with 12 of the 14 land neighbors in peace. As the world’s second largest economy, China’s contribution to global economic growth has remained at 30 years.About %, ranking first in the world for 15 consecutive years. China has become the second largest assessed country in the United Nations’ contributions and peacekeeping funds, actively participates in the construction and reform of the global governance system, and maintains the spirit of the UN Charter and the authority of the UN with practical actions. Facts have proved and will continue to prove that China has always been a builder of world peace, a contributor to global development, and a defender of international order. China will also always work with all peace-loving and justice-oriented countries to unite under the banner of the United Nations, practice true multilateralism, and contribute confidence, wisdom and strength to the universal prosperity of the world and the common progress of mankind.