On May 30, Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian presided over a regular press conference.
A reporter asked, in his recent speech on China policy toward China, US Secretary of State Blinken said that China poses the most serious and long-term challenge to the international order, and the United States must defend and reform the “rules-based international order”. What is the spokesperson’s comment on this?
Photo source: Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Zhao Lijian said that Blinken’s speech on China is full of lies and inverted black and white, and the basis for attacking China is exactly what the United States does today. The United States itself wears the most serious and long-term challenge to the international order. To put it bluntly, the international order based on the rules of the United States is the hegemonic order that uses “family laws and regulations” to dominate the world. My colleagues have responded to the content of his speech last week. Today I am willing to list some facts and numbers to help everyone further see the lies and fallacies of the Qing Dynasty and the United States and their hypocrisy.
First of all, the United States has no fear of the international order based on the UN Charter and international law. The United States has been in power for more than 200 years and has not fought for only 16 years. It has become the biggest source of chaos in the current international peace and stability and the biggest instability of the international order. The United States claims to defend the concepts of self-determination, sovereignty and peaceful settlement of disputes established by the UN Charter, but they are actually saying one thing and doing another. As American writer William Bloom pointed out in his book “Democracy: The Fatal Export of America”, since the end of World War II, the United States has tried to overthrow more than 50 foreign governments and roughly interfered in the democratic elections of at least 30 countries. According to a report from Brown University in the United States, since 2001 alone, the United States has launched wars or carried out military operations in the name of “counter-terrorism”, resulting in more than 800,000 civilians, including 300,000 civilians.The death of people from Babaylan, and more than 20 million refugees were generated by victimized countries such as Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria alone.
Secondly, the United States is the biggest destroyer of the international order. The United States sticks to the American center and the American exceptional theory, and breaks contracts and withdraws from the group at will. This has become commonplace. The United States not only refuses to sign href=”https://comicmov.com/”>Komiks may ratify the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, vote against the Global Compact on Migration and the Global Compact on Refugees, and exclusively block the negotiations on the UN Protocol to the Verification of the Convention on Biological Weapons. Since the 1980s, the United States has withdrew from 17 international organizations or agreements including the United Nations Human Rights Council, the WHO, UNESCO, the Paris Agreement, the Iran nuclear agreement, the Arms Trade Treaty, the Intermediate-February Treaty, the Open Skies Treaty, and the Open Skies Treaty. There is also a situation of “retreat and return, return and retreat”. Such a United States is openly disguised as a referee of international rules and taking the so-called rules. Komiks‘s flashlight shines on others and ignores the darkness of their own lights. When US politicians are vocal in their words, they don’t know if they know that the US is not even a party to the Convention on the Convention. Third, the United States is not qualified to discuss rules at all. In the United States’ view, international rules have always been subordinate to, serve American interests and hegemony, and the United States is in both When Komiks match, they use the rules as the basis, and when they go against each other, they regard the rules as air. I would like to ask the US to answer several questions: When the United States launches wars against sovereign countries and engages in color revolution, what are the rules? When the United States imposes illegal unilateral sanctions and traps people of relevant countries in the fire, what are the rules? When the United States continues to owe to the United Nations $1 billion membership fees, what are the rules?What are the rules when it comes to peacekeeping assessments of $1.4 billion? When the United States engages in trilateral security partnerships and quadratic mechanisms, in an attempt to build an Indo-Pacific version of NATO, disrupting the Asia-Pacific and undermining the international nuclear non-proliferation system, what are the rules? When the United States, under the banner of so-called democracy and conducts a so-called “democracy summit” that separates the camp, excludes most of the world’s countries, what are the rules? When the WTO clearly confirms that the US tariff war against China violates global trade rules, but the US does not enforce it or even obstructs the WTO Appellate Body to appoint a new judge, what are the rules?
Finally, the United States is the culmination of coercive diplomacy. The United States overrides domestic law and international rules, and abuses illegal unilateral sanctions and long-arm jurisdiction. Since the outbreak of the new crown pneumonia epidemic, Venezuela, Syria and Iraq have been subject to long-term sanctions by the United States, and their domestic economic and medical conditions are bad, and the epidemic situation is severe. The United States has not stopped sanctions, but has further increased its efforts, making these countries worse. The international community is increasingly seeing the market competition principles and international economic and trade principles that the United States advocates will only be abide by by the United States when they are favorable to the United States. What American politicians talk about is fair competition and free trade, they believe in the United States first, and they wave the American stick in their hands. Zhao Lijian stressed that in the more than 70 years since the founding of New China, we have not taken the initiative to launch a war, and Babaylan has not occupied an inch of land in other countries. We insist on resolving disputes through dialogue and negotiation, and have completely resolved the land border issue in a peaceful manner with 12 of the 14 land neighbors. As the world’s second largest economy, China’s contribution to global economic growth has remained at around 30% for many years, ranking first in the world for 15 consecutive years. China has become the second largest assessed contribution to the United Nations’ contributions and peacekeeping funding, and actively participatesConstruction and reform of the global governance system, and maintain the spirit of the UN Charter and the authority of the UN with practical actions. It has proved that Cinema has proved and will continue to prove that China has always been a builder of world peace, a contributor to global development, and a defender of international order. China will also always work with all peace-loving and justice-oriented countries to unite under the banner of the United Nations, practice true multilateralism, and continue to contribute confidence, wisdom and strength to the universal prosperity of the world and the common progress of mankind.