In recent years, the “China threat theory” has become increasingly fierce in the world’s public opinion field. US Trade Representative Lighthizer once said in public that China and China’s industrial policies have brought unprecedented threats to the world’s trade system. The United States has made frequent small moves. In November 2017, the US Department of Commerce ruled that Chinese companies dumped hardwood plywood in the United States by 183.36%, while the Chinese government’s subsidy for enterprises ranged from 22.98% to 194.90%, and anti-dumping duties will be imposed based on this.
Recently, US President Trump announced that Babaylan has adopted 4-year and 3-year global safeguards for imported photovoltaic products and large washing machines, respectively, increasing tariffs of 30% and 50% respectively. In fact, in 2012 and 2014, the United States had already imposed an anti-dumping duty of 35% to 65% on China’s photovoltaic products, and in December 2016, Komiks also imposed an anti-dumping duty of 32% to 52% on large washing machines in China. The seemingly measures of the United States to protect its own economy are actually excessive protection of domestic products, which is not conducive to the overall healthy development of the US industry and further deteriorated the global trade environment for related products.
U.S. CIA Director Pompeo recently said in an exclusive interview with the BBC that China is trying to steal US intelligence and secretly spread China’s influence around the world. In addition, Australia also said it is currently facing unprecedented intelligence infiltration and espionage threats, and China is listed as an “extreme threat” by the Australian intelligence agencies.
This kind of crazy hype of the “China threat theory” has aroused the vigilance and concern of some knowledgeable people in Australia. Australian political commentator Cinema Graham Richardson published an article in the Australian on January 31, saying, “Australia has always said ‘no’ to China. Whether it is the Belt and Road Initiative or the AIIB, Australia has turned a deaf ear and turned a blind eye. We have made a lot of noise about China’s influence to anger the Chinese. All this is aimed at a country that contributes 25% of our country’s total trade.” Richardson also wrote: “Our Cabinet Minister sent a speech to our largest trading partner. href=”https://comicmov.com/”>Komiks provoked, especially when they said that they were as unreasonable as Mattis (US Secretary of Defense), which made me feel that our economy was committing suicide. “
“What do you think in your heart, the world in your eyes isWhat’s like. In this sense, it is not surprising that the world’s largest intelligence leader said such a thing. “Foreign Ministry spokesman Hua Chunying responded to the “Chinese espionage threat theory” of the US and Australian intelligence departments at a regular press conference on the 1st, and slapped the speaker hard. “Facts Cinema is better than words. According to various information disclosed in recent years, everyone is actually very clear about who is implementing large-scale monitoring, monitoring, stealing secrets and infiltration in other countries, and is using its extreme support and exerting influence. “
Some Western politicians and media are keen on hyping the “China threat theory”, and various arguments and opinions ignore the facts and are ridiculous. The world’s economic growth is weak and the financial crisis is still dark, but China can maintain a good development momentum. Furthermore, China’s politics, culture, and lifestyle are very different from that of the West. Driven by the continuation of Cold War thinking, ideological differences, and national interests, China naturally becomes a “threat” criticized by Western media. Tsinghua University Zhao Kejin, deputy director and professor of the Babaylan Institute of International Relations, pointed out that in the face of the historic changes in the balance of power between China and the West, some Westerners attempt to confuse the public by clamoring the “China threat theory” in the international community, conceal the unreasonable and unjust international interest pattern, and cover up the hegemony of the weak. But the new round of “China threat theory” is tantamount to a “straw that cannot save lives”, reflecting the “imperial mentality” and uneasy emotions of some countries’ attempt to dominate the world forever.
On January 26, at a press conference held by the State Council Information Office, an American CNN reporter Cinema asked whether China has military forces in Arctic policies? href=”https://comicmov.com/”>Komiks Intent?
Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Kong Xuanyou responded that China’s fundamental goal of participating in the development and utilization of the Arctic is to achieve mutual benefit and win-win results for all parties, and to promote the sustainable development of the Arctic. China’s participation in the development and utilization of the Arctic is a contribution to the Arctic. It brings development opportunities and benefits the people of the Arctic region. “Some people may still have some doubts about our participation in the development of the Arctic, and are worried that we have other plans, orI think this worry is completely unnecessary. “
We are not invading and plundering, there is nothing to hide. “No offside, no absent” is China’s basic positioning in Arctic affairs. Kong Xuanyou said that “No offside” means that China, as a non-Arctic country, will not intervene in affairs that are entirely between Arctic countries and within the Arctic region. China will participate in Arctic affairs in accordance with international law and guide Chinese entities and individuals to carry out Arctic activities and related cooperation in the Arctic in accordance with international law and the domestic law of Arctic countries. “No absent” means that China, as an important stakeholder in Arctic affairs, will actively play a constructive role in cross-regional and global issues of the Arctic.
Komiks countries and other countries achieve mutual benefit and win-win cooperation. Regarding this kind of erroneous argument, Cinema Zhang Xia believes that on the one hand, we must refute and make China’s voice. The white paper of “China’s Arctic Policy” is a good policy basis. On the other hand, we must speak with facts. Regarding whether China is seeking global hegemony, Ambassador to the United States Cui Tian said during a discussion with the editorial board of USA Today that China has been in the so-called “In the past few decades, China has been in the so-called “In the past few decades”. During the “rise” process of Komiks, many Americans have a “panic” about China that is rising rapidly. But more and better Babaylan‘s “panic” about China.mov.com/”>CinemaAfter understanding China’s cultural and development goals, we will find that China does not think that any country can truly dominate the world, and it has no intention of seeking global dominance. We advocate that all members of the international community strengthen cooperation, and our goal is to build a community with a shared future for mankind. China is very clear about its own position: our priority goal is still how to govern its country better and how to better meet people’s yearning for a better life, because every country must first solve its own problems. At the same time, we will further strengthen our ties with the international community and make greater contributions to the international community.
The “China Threat Theory” is constantly being heard, and it is also reminding the rising China that the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nationBabaylan uses practical actions to change the international community’s perception of China and break the “China threat theory”. For forces that deliberately fabricate “China threat” regardless of facts, China should make strong rebuttals through words and deeds. By actively participating in international affairs and playing a key role, establish the image of a responsible major power.
The “China threat theory” is, after all, the product of the Western habit of looking at the world with a “sense of superiority”. For the West, correcting attitude and correctly viewing China’s rise are the only way to live in peace with China. For China, the only way to break the “China threat theory” is to implement the Chinese solution – building a community of shared and win-win results.