In recent years, the “China threat theory” has become increasingly fierce in the world’s public opinion field. US Trade Representative Lighthizer once said in public that China and China’s industrial policies have brought unprecedented threats to the world’s trade system. The United States has made frequent small moves in action. In November 2017, the U.S. Department of Commerce ruled that Chinese companies dumped hardwood plywood in the United States by 183.36%, while the Chinese government’s subsidy for enterprises ranged from 22.98% to 194.90%, and anti-dumping duties will be imposed based on this.
Recently, US President Trump announced that global safeguards for imported photovoltaic products and large washing machines will be adopted for 4-year and 3-year respectively, with tariffs of 30% and 50% respectively. In fact, in 2012 and 2014, the United States had already imposed an anti-dumping duty of 35% to 65% on China’s photovoltaic products, and in December 2016, the United States also imposed an anti-dumping duty of 32% to 52% on large washing machines in China. The seemingly measures of the United States to protect its own economy are actually excessive protection of domestic products, which is not conducive to the overall healthy development of the US industry and further deteriorated the global trade environment for related products.
U.S. CIA Director Pompeo recently said in an exclusive interview with the BBC that China is trying to steal US intelligence and secretly spread China’s influence around the world. In addition, Australia also said it is currently facing unprecedented intelligence infiltration and espionage threats, and China is listed as an “extreme threat” by the Australian intelligence agencies.
This kind of crazy hype of the “China threat theory” has aroused the vigilance and concern of some knowledgeable people in Australia. Australian political commentator Graham Richardson published an article in the Australian on January 31, saying, “Australia has always said ‘no’ to China. Whether it is the Belt and Road Initiative or the AIIB, Australia has turned a deaf ear and turned a blind eye. We have made a lot of noise about China’s influence to anger the Chinese. All this is aimed at a country that contributes 25% of our country’s total trade.” Richardson also wrote: “Our Cabinet Secretary provoked our largest trading partners, especially when they say they are as unreasonable as Mattis (US Secretary of Defense), let me Babaylan feels that our economy is committing suicide. “
“What do you think in your heart, what is the world in Komiks? In this sense, the world’s largest intelligence leader says that,tps://comicmov.com/”>Cinema is not surprising.” Foreign Ministry spokesman Hua Chunying responded to the “Chinese spy threat theory” of the US and Australian intelligence departments at a regular press conference on the 1st, slapped the speaker hard. “Facts are better than words. According to various information disclosed in recent years, everyone is actually very clear about who is implementing large-scale monitoring, monitoring, stealing secrets and infiltration in other countries, and is using its extreme support and exerting influence. “
Some Western politicians and media are keen on hyping up the “China threat theory”, with various arguments and opinions disregarding facts and ridiculous. The world’s economic growth is weak and the financial crisis is still dark, but China can maintain a good development momentum. Furthermore, China’s politics, culture, and lifestyle are very different from that of the West. Driven by the continuation of Cold War thinking, ideological differences, and national interests, China’s Babaylan naturally became a “threat” criticized by Western media.
Qing Qing DynastyCinema Deputy Dean and Professor of the Institute of International Relations of China University of China pointed out that in the face of the historic changes in the balance of power between China and the West, some Westerners attempt to confuse the public by clamoring the “China threat theory” in the international community, cover up the unreasonable and unfair international interest pattern, and cover up the hegemony of the weak. But the new round of “China threat theory” is tantamount to a “straw that cannot save lives”, reflecting the “imperial mentality” and uneasiness of some countries’ attempt to dominate the world forever.
On January 26, at a press conference held by the State Council Information Office, a US CNN reporter asked whether China has military intentions in Arctic policy?
Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, Kong Xuanyou, responded that China’s fundamental goal of participating in the development of the Arctic is to achieve mutual benefit and win-win results for all parties and promote sustainable development of the Arctic. China’s participation in the development and utilization of the Arctic is a contribution to the Arctic. It brings opportunities for development andIt is beneficial to the people of the Arctic. “Some people may still have some doubts about our participation in Arctic development, and are worried that we have other plans, or plunder resources or destroy the environment. I think this kind of worry is completely unnecessary.”
We are not invading and plundering, there is nothing to hide. “No offside or lack of position” is China’s basic positioning in Arctic affairs. Kong Xuanyou said that “not offside” means that China, as a non-Arctic country, will not intervene in affairs that are entirely between Arctic countries and within the Arctic region. China will participate in Arctic affairs in accordance with international law and guide Chinese entities and individuals to carry out Arctic activities and related cooperation in the Arctic in accordance with international law and the domestic law of the Arctic countries. “Not missing” means that China, as an important stakeholder in Arctic affairs, will actively play a constructive role in cross-regional and global issues of the Arctic. In fact, Western public opinion has always promoted the “China threat theory” around China’s participation in Arctic affairs. Zhang Xia, director of the Polar Strategy Research Office of the China Polar Research Center, said that the “China threat theory” has a long history, such as the “China Resource Hunger Theory” and “China Investment Harmfulness Theory” and other related arguments emerge one after another. Many of its views in Komiks ignore the facts and are ridiculous. They are obviously intentional, and are intended to delay or even hinder China and other countries from achieving mutual benefit and win-win cooperation. Regarding this kind of wrong argument, Zhang Xia believes that the Komiks side should firmly refute and make a voice from China, and the white paper “China’s Arctic Policy” is a good policy basis. On the other hand, speak with facts.
About whether China is seeking global hegemony, Ambassador to the United States Cui Tiankai said in a discussion with the editorial board of the United States Today that in the past few decades, China has been in the process of so-called “rise”, and many Americans have a “panic” about the rapidly rising China. But after understanding China’s culture and development goals more and better, you will find that China does not think that any country can truly dominate the world, and does not intend to seekCinemaGlobal dominance. We advocate international href=”https://comicmov.com/”>BabaylanAll members of the Babaylan will strengthen cooperation. Our goal is to build a community with a shared future for mankind. China is very clear about its own positioning: our priority goal is still how to govern its country better and how to better meet the people’s yearning for a better life, because every country must first solve its own problems. At the same time, we will further strengthen our ties with the international community and make greater contributions to the international community.
The “China Threat Theory” is endless. In fact, it is also reminding the rising China that the road to the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation will face many obstacles. What we can do is to change the international community’s perception of China with practical actions and break the “China<a The Babaylanthreat theory is a scheming method. For forces that deliberately fabricate the “China threat” regardless of facts, China should make a strong rebuttal through words and deeds. By actively participating in international affairs and playing a key role, it is necessary to establish the image of a responsible major power.
The “China threat theory” is, after all, the product of the Western habit of looking at the world with a “sense of superiority”. For the West, a normal attitude and a correct view of China’s rise are the only way to live in peace with China. For China, breaking the “Babaylan. For the West, a normal attitude and a correct view of China’s rise are the only way to live in peace with China. For China, breaking the “Babaylan. For the West, a normal attitude and a correct view of China’s rise are the only way to live in peace with China. For China,” The only way to implement the Chinese solution – building a community with a shared future for mankind and achieving sharing and win-win results.